• Skip to site navigation
  • Skip to blog entries
  • Skip to archive page
  • Skip to right sidebar

vSphere 4.1 Network Traffic Management - Emergence of 10 GigE

NTPRO.NL - Eric Sloof

  • NTPRO.NL
  • Online Training
  • VMworld
  • Videos
  • Tools
  • iTunes
  • About

Tuesday, 13 July 2010

vSphere 4.1 Network Traffic Management - Emergence of 10 GigE

The diagram at left should be familiar to most. When using 1GigE NICs, ESX hosts are typically deployed with NICs dedicated to particular traffic types. For example you may dedicate 4x 1GigE NICs for VM traffic; one NIC to iSCSI, another NIC to vMotion, and another to the service console. Each traffic type gets a dedicated bandwidth by virtue of the physical NIC allocation. 



Moving to the diagram at right … ESX hosts deployed with 10GigE NICs are likely to be deployed (for the time being) with only two 10GigE interfaces. Multiple traffic types will be converged over the two interfaces. So long as the load offered to the 10GE interfaces is less than 10GE, everything is ok—the NIC can service the offered load. But what happens when the offered load from the various traffic types exceeds the capacity of the interface? What happens when you offer say 11Gbps to a 10GigE interface? Something has to suffer. This is where Network IO Control steps in. It addresses the issue of oversubscription by allowing you to set the relative importance of predetermined traffic types. 

NetIOC is controlled with two parameters—Limits and Shares.

Limits, as the name suggests, sets a limit for that traffic type (e.g VM traffic) across the NIC team. The value is specified in absolute terms in Mbps. When set, that traffic type will not exceed that limit *outbound* (or egress) of the host.

Shares specify the relative importance of that traffic type when those traffic types compete for a particular vmnic (phyiscal NIC). Shares are specified in abstract units numbered between 1 and 100 and indicate the relative importance of that traffic type. For example, if iSCSI has a shares value of 50, and FT logging has a shares value of 100, then FT traffic will get 2x the bandwidth of iSCSI when they compete. If they were both set at 50, or both set at 100, then they would both get the same level of service (bandwidth).

There are a number of preset values for shares ranging from low to high. You can also set custom values. Note that the limits and shares apply to output or egress from the ESX host, not input.

Remember that shares apply to the vmnics; limits apply across a team.

Posted by
Eric Sloof
in vSphere at 07:25 | No comments | No Trackbacks
Bookmark and Share
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
No comments
Add Comment
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
   
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.
 
 


Twitter RSS FeedLinkedIn

www.hetesambal.nl

Veeam Webinar with Doug Hazelman: 5 Steps to Successful Backup & Replication for Hyper-V! Watch it now >>

Recent Entries

Storage Design and Implementation in vSphere 5.0 - The Rough Cuts
Thursday, January 19 2012
Top 25 Free Tools for VMware vSphere presented by David Davis and Kendrick Coleman
Monday, January 16 2012
LG Android running VMware Horizon Mobile hands-on
Saturday, January 14 2012
Forbes Guthrie has released the vSphere 5 vReference Card
Thursday, January 12 2012
VMworld Session - VMware vMotion in VMware vSphere 5: Architecture, Performance & Best Practices
Wednesday, January 11 2012
Voice Over IP (VoIP) Performance Evaluation on VMware vSphere 5.0
Tuesday, January 10 2012
VMware vCloud Director 1.5 Performance and Best Practices
Monday, January 9 2012
VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager 5.0 Performance and Best Practices
Sunday, January 8 2012
New Training - VMware vSphere 5 Design Workshop
Saturday, January 7 2012
New Training - VMware View 5 Install, Configure and Manage
Friday, January 6 2012

Archive

  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (23)
  • December 2011 (21)
  • November 2011 (24)
  • October 2011 (27)
  • September 2011 (26)
  • August 2011 (35)
  • July 2011 (26)
  • June 2011 (15)
  • May 2011 (20)
  • April 2011 (22)
  • March 2011 (22)
  • February 2011 (18)
  • January 2011 (13)
  • December 2010 (23)
  • November 2010 (18)
  • October 2010 (31)
  • September 2010 (22)
  • August 2010 (23)
  • July 2010 (19)
  • June 2010 (19)
  • May 2010 (19)
  • April 2010 (20)
  • March 2010 (23)
  • February 2010 (22)
  • January 2010 (30)
  • December 2009 (37)
  • November 2009 (29)
  • October 2009 (27)
  • September 2009 (36)
  • August 2009 (35)
  • July 2009 (35)
  • June 2009 (43)
  • May 2009 (35)
  • April 2009 (56)
  • March 2009 (51)
  • February 2009 (69)
  • January 2009 (69)
  • December 2008 (60)
  • November 2008 (56)
  • October 2008 (49)
  • September 2008 (63)
  • August 2008 (44)
  • July 2008 (54)
  • June 2008 (26)
  • May 2008 (34)
  • April 2008 (27)
  • March 2008 (38)
  • February 2008 (29)
  • January 2008 (35)
  • December 2007 (24)
  • November 2007 (23)
  • October 2007 (20)
  • September 2007 (54)
  • August 2007 (15)
  • July 2007 (22)
  • June 2007 (13)
  • May 2007 (8)
  • April 2007 (20)
  • March 2007 (10)
  • Recent...
  • Older...
Based on the s9y Bulletproof template framework
Powered by s9y – Template by Bulletproof development team.
  • NTPRO.NL
  • Online Training
  • VMworld
  • Videos
  • Tools
  • iTunes
  • About