<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>Eric Sloof - NTPRO.NL - Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/</link>
    <description>Eric Sloof - NTPRO.NL - Eric Sloof</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.7-rc3 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Rickard Nobel: New Book - VCDX Boot Camp: Preparing for the VCDX Panel Defense</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2351-New-Book-VCDX-Boot-Camp-Preparing-for-the-VCDX-Panel-Defense.html#c2784</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2351-New-Book-VCDX-Boot-Camp-Preparing-for-the-VCDX-Panel-Defense.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2351</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Rickard Nobel)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    It looks like an interesting title, I hope to be able to check it out. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:47:21 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2351-guid.html#c2784</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>click the up coming webpage: VMware Technical Sales Professional (VTSP)</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/482-VMware-Technical-Sales-Professional-VTSP.html#c2759</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/482-VMware-Technical-Sales-Professional-VTSP.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=482</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (click the up coming webpage)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Hi it&#039;s me, I am also visiting this site daily, this site is genuinely fastidious and the viewers are truly sharing pleasant thoughts. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:28:24 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/482-guid.html#c2759</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Luis: Visio in the Cloud? - Online Diagram Software</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1755-Visio-in-the-Cloud-Online-Diagram-Software.html#c2738</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1755-Visio-in-the-Cloud-Online-Diagram-Software.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1755</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Luis)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Wow -- thanks Lisa.  I&#039;ve just started using Lucidchart and am quite impressed.  

Out with Visio and in with Lucidchart&#039;s Visio editor.  I&#039;ve transferred a few of my VSD files without a hitch. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:11:10 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1755-guid.html#c2738</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>comunedicogliate.it: vmware-mks.cab workaround</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/177-vmware-mks.cab-workaround.html#c2735</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/177-vmware-mks.cab-workaround.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=177</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (comunedicogliate.it)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any 
widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates.
I&#039;ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this. Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:35:59 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/177-guid.html#c2735</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Jeremy Otten: NAKIVO Rewards VMware Professionals with NFR Licenses for VM Backup and Replication</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2282-NAKIVO-Rewards-VMware-Professionals-with-NFR-Licenses-for-VM-Backup-and-Replication.html#c2729</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2282-NAKIVO-Rewards-VMware-Professionals-with-NFR-Licenses-for-VM-Backup-and-Replication.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2282</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Jeremy Otten)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Going to give this one a go. Am VCP 3/4/5 so...

At the moment we do everything with Acronis VMProtect, but I am always looking at New Products.. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:48:18 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2282-guid.html#c2729</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>anuncios clasificados: VMWare Infrastructure Task Library in Workflow Studio</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/292-VMWare-Infrastructure-Task-Library-in-Workflow-Studio.html#c2723</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/292-VMWare-Infrastructure-Task-Library-in-Workflow-Studio.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=292</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (anuncios clasificados)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Amazing blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from 
somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog 
stand out. Please let me know where you got your design.
Bless you 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:21:02 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/292-guid.html#c2723</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Fedor Alberts: New Technical White Paper - The CPU Scheduler in VMware vSphere 5.1</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2266-New-Technical-White-Paper-The-CPU-Scheduler-in-VMware-vSphere-5.1.html#c2700</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2266-New-Technical-White-Paper-The-CPU-Scheduler-in-VMware-vSphere-5.1.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2266</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Fedor Alberts)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    When using an physical (blade) system with two CPUs, each containing 16 cores,  what would be the maximum amount of vCPU one could (should) assign to a CPU intensive application like Sybase? Would that be 32 or is it better to “reserve” two CPUs for the system and therefore leave 30 vCPU available? 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:12:06 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2266-guid.html#c2700</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Bjorn: Free vCenter Operations Manager Now Included with vSphere</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#c2682</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2206</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Bjorn)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    There something fishy here. VMware has no information what so ever that I can find regarding foundation edition. I have a case open and they are answering all questions but how to get it. 

Fishy... They made big deal out of it on VMworld, but again with vague information.

I heard some rumor that it will be separately released mid November, but no one seems to be able to confirm that. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:00:30 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-guid.html#c2682</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Frank Abdoelhafiezkhan:  Principled Technologies Report - View 5 Compared to Citrix XenDesktop 5.5</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1999-Principled-Technologies-Report-View-5-Compared-to-Citrix-XenDesktop-5.5.html#c2673</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1999-Principled-Technologies-Report-View-5-Compared-to-Citrix-XenDesktop-5.5.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1999</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Frank Abdoelhafiezkhan)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Is this document written by VMware or a VMware fan, or is this document written by an independent engineer?

In USA and UK XenDektop is the most choosen VDI solution than VMware View. Spoken to many engineers in large company&#039;s they have choosen for XenDesktop because of TCO and performance. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:28:19 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1999-guid.html#c2673</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Peter: VMware vSphere Multi-Hypervisor Management Demo</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2181-VMware-vSphere-Multi-Hypervisor-Management-Demo.html#c2672</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2181-VMware-vSphere-Multi-Hypervisor-Management-Demo.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2181</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Peter)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Is there any announcement, when/where we can get this plugin.
Thx
Peter 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:50:29 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2181-guid.html#c2672</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Hongjun Ma: Community and Isolated PVLANs traffic travels tagged as the associated Secondary PVLAN</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1466-Community-and-Isolated-PVLANs-traffic-travels-tagged-as-the-associated-Secondary-PVLAN.html#c2664</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1466-Community-and-Isolated-PVLANs-traffic-travels-tagged-as-the-associated-Secondary-PVLAN.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1466</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Hongjun Ma)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Hi Eric, I got the question in regard to VMware notes &quot;Physical Switch must be PVLAN aware&quot;. From your video(btw, great video!) and from my testing, the physical switch connecting to 2 ESXi hosts can just define all vlans as regular vlans, the traffic will pass ok with end points as VDS doing private vlan. In your case, you just defined 4 regular(non PVLAN) vlans 23-26 and everything runs good.

I think Vmware note is inaccurate. You need don&#039;t need PVLAN enabled on a transit physical switch.

any thoughts? 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:45:43 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1466-guid.html#c2664</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Marco: Nicira behind the scenes with Thomas Kraus, Chris Colotti and Kamau Wanguhu</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2193-Nicira-behind-the-scenes-with-Thomas-Kraus,-Chris-Colotti-and-Kamau-Wanguhu.html#c2662</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2193-Nicira-behind-the-scenes-with-Thomas-Kraus,-Chris-Colotti-and-Kamau-Wanguhu.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2193</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Marco)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Great work, Eric and your TV-team! I finally finished wathing all of the videos. It was almost as beeing there! :-) 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:30:53 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2193-guid.html#c2662</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Tom: Free vCenter Operations Manager Now Included with vSphere</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#c2661</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2206</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Tom)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Would you please be more specific?? People want to know specifically how to get vCOPs Manager Foundation specifically.

Thank you, Tom 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:50:37 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-guid.html#c2661</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Thomas: Free vCenter Operations Manager Now Included with vSphere</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#c2660</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2206</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Thomas)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Foundation will be available with vC Ops 5.6 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:05:44 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-guid.html#c2660</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Barry Coombs: Free vCenter Operations Manager Now Included with vSphere</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#c2658</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2206</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Barry Coombs)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Hi Eric

Do you know when this will be available to be downloaded?

It doesn&#039;t appear on VMware&#039;s website at the moment

Cheers

Barry 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:31:41 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-guid.html#c2658</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Stephan: Free vCenter Operations Manager Now Included with vSphere</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#c2657</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2206</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Stephan)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Super... und wo kann man den free vCenter Operations Manager Foundation downloaden ?? 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:25:51 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-guid.html#c2657</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>daunce_: Free vCenter Operations Manager Now Included with vSphere</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#c2656</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2206</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (daunce_)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Wow. Great news Mr Scoop.

It doesn&#039;t have dynamic thresholds, so i&#039;m curious how the proactive smart alerts go. Either way, I&#039;ll be running this up as soon as i can.

Here&#039;s a comparison of vCOP editions:
http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/compare-editions.html 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 03:23:09 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-guid.html#c2656</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Tom: Free vCenter Operations Manager Now Included with vSphere</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#c2655</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-Free-vCenter-Operations-Manager-Now-Included-with-vSphere.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2206</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Tom)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I saw this somewhere else but NOwhere have I seen it clear where/how to GET this &quot;Foundation&quot; version.

Thank you, Tom 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:32:54 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2206-guid.html#c2655</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Lubomir Zvolensky : Myth - E1000 is faster than VMXNET3</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1932-Myth-E1000-is-faster-than-VMXNET3.html#c2649</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1932-Myth-E1000-is-faster-than-VMXNET3.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1932</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Lubomir Zvolensky )</author>
    <content:encoded>
    guys, I have clocked two virtual machines running on the same physical host and found totally different results (one of them is alligned with your, though)

- physical hosts : HP Proliant DL120 G6, one CPU, four cores but I don&#039;t remember exact model of CPU, 8GB physical RAM, local SATA storage 1x 160GB HDD [RAM and storage being not important in this test as long as we generate packets, right ?]

- esx v5.0  version 5.0.0 U1 fully patched up to ESXi500-201207001
- re-tested again with v5.1 last week
- simple vNetwork, Gigabit/auto or Gigabit/Full duplex manual settings do not change the results at all. Switch Dlink exact model unknown, 48 port enterprise class, 19&quot; rackmountable, no other traffic there only my ESX hosts.
- no other virtual machines installed/running on those hosts. This was dedicated platform for my testing only.

- virtual machine v7 and v8
- Mikrotik linux distribution , versions v5.7, v5.15,
v5.17 and current latest v5.20 tested. Each VM allocated one core, later two cores in repeated test which honestly didn&#039;t change the results at all. 512MB vRAM as it&#039;s plenty enough for this system and test (used around 40MB RAM only, hey this is linux right), vmxnet3, e1000, e1000e virtual adapters. Seems like the version of Mikrotik had absolutely no influence on result of test, read more below.


There is built-in test in those Mikrotik distributions enabling user to test with random or compressible data. It is possible to have receive/send/both streams. Compressible data heavily load CPU as expected and is not representative measurement due to variations, but random generated uncompressible data leads to repeatitive statistically meaningful results as there is extremely low delta in results : usually it is within 3% which is excellent.

As far as I understand, the built-in throughput test in Mikrotik is based on iperf. Mikrotik has their own CLI so it is not standard linux command line thus no verification of this is possible. But I think this is not important, as far as we believe the vendor and generate packets (for sure they are not read/written from disk !! easily verified) and those packets are not compressible (verifiable but sorry I won&#039;t capture the traffic and analyze it afterwards), the test is performed in absolutely repeated and correct way.

Now the results : vmxnet3 gives little around 400Mbit/s throughput (380 to 410Mbit/s) while E1000 and E1000E both yield 990Mbit/s throughput with minimum of 975Mbit/s. Let me stress out stable and repeated EVERY TIME so this is extremely consistent, with every setting, every version of ESX, Mikrotik in virtual machines.

This leads me to think : is the VMXNET3 driver in Mikrotik flawed and not working optimally ? The answer is probably no. Explanation - the result of 400Mbit/s I achieved with VMXNET3 is extremely aligned with the result presented here in your blog. The only huge difference is with the E1000/E1000E results where I have three times as much performance.



I&#039;m presenting detailed description so anyone of you can re-test. If you see any problems in my &quot;methodology&quot;, let me know.


So no eggs are created equal and it is heavily possible that 
E1000/E1000E are FASTER than VMXNET3. I dare to re-test this with 
Windows 2008, 2003 and Windows7, stay tuned :) 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:00:06 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/1932-guid.html#c2649</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Alex Muetstege: Cool Tool - PsPing</title>
    <link>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2178-Cool-Tool-PsPing.html#c2647</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2178-Cool-Tool-PsPing.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2178</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alex Muetstege)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Just to be lazy, I use a GUI tool for this called MTR. MTR stands for Matty&#039;s TraceRoute or MyTraceRoute (depending on who you ask) and orignally was a Linux alternative for the traceroute command. It merges ping and ping stats with traceroute info so you cannot only see what the latency to your destination is, but also check where your latency on route is caused (i.e. faulty router config or bad transit somewhere). The Windows version can be downloaded at http://winmtr.net/, the original site can be found at http://www.bitwizard.nl/mtr/. There also is an OSX transcode (Cli version) but you can also download the sourcecode and compile it, see http://www.practiceofcode.com/post/457590665/compiling-mtr-for-mac-os-x-snow-leopard. 

My 2 cents about this :) 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:25:35 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntpro.nl/blog/archives/2178-guid.html#c2647</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
